2026 NFL season, half-PPR rankings
  1. The Fantasy 50
  2. Accuracy
  3. 2026 half-PPR DEF

Season standings

Most accurate DEF rankings, 2026 half-PPR

  • DEF · Season through week 8
  • Methodology v1
  • Published 2026-11-03

Who has the most accurate DEF rankings in 2026?

FantasyPros Consensus has the most accurate DEF rankings of 2026 through Week 8, with a season skill score of 11.9. No individual ranker has beaten the FantasyPros consensus at DEF this season. That's over 8 scored weeks. The skill score shows how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect.

Ranked
14
Unranked
32

Platform standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

DEF · Season through week 8, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-11-03. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
11.9
Benchmark–8 of 818.8 wk 8
2
Draft Sharks
Consensus
8.7
3.2 behind64%8 of 821.2 wk 8
3
3.7
8.2 behind58%8 of 817.6 wk 8
4
-1.3
13.2 behind46%8 of 815.3 wk 8
5
-4.7
16.6 behind46%8 of 824.7 wk 8
6
-29.1
41.0 behind46%7 of 8-23.5 wk 8

Individual expert standings

Rankers scored in at least 6 weeks and 75% of all weeks. The skill score measures how much better than a random order a ranker's rankings matched how players actually scored: 0 is random, 100 is perfect, and most rankers land between about 5 and 35, and below 0 means worse than a random order. “vs consensus” compares it with the FantasyPros consensus, which few rankers beat, and “right when they disagreed” shows how often a ranker's own calls (pairs of players ordered differently from the consensus) proved right, where 50% is a coin flip.

DEF · Season through week 8, 2026 half-PPR. Results published 2026-11-03. Ties at the displayed precision share a rank.
RankRankerSeason skill scorevs consensusRight when they disagreedWeeks scoredLatest week
1
Liz Loza
Individual
7.6
4.3 behind50%8 of 824.7 wk 8
2
Field Yates
Individual
7.2
4.7 behind48%8 of 85.9 wk 8
3
Eric Moody
Individual
7.1
4.9 behind49%8 of 816.5 wk 8
4
Daniel Dopp
Individual
5.3
6.6 behind47%8 of 823.5 wk 8
4
5.3
6.6 behind46%8 of 821.2 wk 8
6
Mike Clay
Individual
2.2
9.7 behind44%8 of 824.7 wk 8
6
Matt Bowen
Individual
2.2
9.7 behind49%8 of 89.4 wk 8
8
Eric Karabell
Individual
2.1
9.9 behind41%8 of 811.8 wk 8

Unranked platform samples

Below the 6-week, 75% gate. Shown for transparency, not ranked, and not compared with the qualified standings.

DEF · Season through week 8, 2026 half-PPR.
RankerSkill score so farWeeks scored
The Fantasy Footballers Consensus
Consensus
18.81 of 8
Sleeper app projections
Team
-7.11 of 8
CBS Sports Fantasy Consensus
Consensus
-16.51 of 8

Unranked individual expert samples

Below the 6-week, 75% gate. Shown for transparency, not ranked, and not compared with the qualified standings.

DEF · Season through week 8, 2026 half-PPR.
RankerSkill score so farWeeks scored
David Biggs
Individual
31.81 of 8
Dave Kluge
Individual
30.61 of 8
Ken Zalis
Individual
25.91 of 8
Mauricio Gutierrez
Individual
24.71 of 8
Pat Fitzmaurice
Individual
22.41 of 8
Pete Nova
Individual
21.21 of 8
Elisha Twerski
Individual
21.21 of 8
Jonathan Stone
Individual
18.81 of 8
Mike Wright
Individual
18.81 of 8
Matt Harmon
Individual
18.81 of 8
Dalton Del Don
Individual
17.61 of 8
Kelly Smelser
Individual
16.51 of 8
Jeff Boggis
Individual
16.51 of 8
Kev Wheeler
Individual
15.31 of 8
Matthew Freedman
Individual
14.11 of 8
Scott Pianowski
Individual
14.11 of 8
Andy Holloway
Individual
14.11 of 8
Jason Moore
Individual
14.11 of 8
Joel Smyth
Individual
12.91 of 8
Nick Raducanu
Individual
11.81 of 8
Patrick Thorman
Individual
10.61 of 8
Andy Behrens
Individual
9.41 of 8
Rudy Gamble
Individual
7.11 of 8
Nick Mariano
Individual
0.01 of 8
Jamey Eisenberg
Individual
-2.41 of 8
Aaron St Denis
Individual
-5.91 of 8
Dave Richard
Individual
-7.11 of 8
Jeff Paur
Individual
-12.91 of 8
Heath Cummings
Individual
-24.71 of 8

Weekly reports

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8

Limitations

  • Rankings lock 5 minutes before each week's first scheduled game. News after the lock isn't reflected.
  • A small lead isn't automatically meaningful. Minimum sample gates limit small-sample claims; they don't establish statistical confidence.
  • DEF results don't carry over to other positions or scoring formats.
  • Past measured results don't establish future superiority.
v1Formula, lock policy, ties and missing-data treatment are in the methodology. Results use one methodology version per cohort; versions are never averaged together.Read the methodology

Compare fantasy football services · Report a correction